Supabase Analysis

• Free Plan: $0/month

  • Unlimited API requests
  • 50,000 monthly active users
  • 500 MB database size
  • Shared CPU, 500 MB RAM
  • 5 GB bandwidth
  • 1 GB file storage
  • Community support
  • Projects paused after 1 week of inactivity, limit of 2 active projects.

• Pro Plan: From $25/month

  • $10 in compute credits included
  • 100,000 monthly active users, then $0.00325 per MAU
  • 8 GB disk size per project, then $0.125 per GB
  • 250 GB bandwidth, then $0.09 per GB
  • 100 GB file storage, then $0.021 per GB
  • Email support
  • Daily backups stored for 7 days
  • 7-day log retention.

• Team Plan: From $599/month

  • $10 in compute credits included
  • Everything in Pro Plan, plus:
  • SOC2 compliance
  • HIPAA available as paid add-on
  • Read-only and Billing member roles
  • SSO for Supabase Dashboard
  • Priority email support & SLAs
  • Daily backups stored for 14 days
  • 28-day log retention.

• Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing

  • Designated Support manager
  • Uptime SLAs
  • On-premise support
  • 24×7×365 premium enterprise support
  • Private Slack channel
  • Custom Security Questionnaires.

Freemium model with tiered pricing for different user needs and enterprise solutions.

Supabase primarily focuses on the software development industry, specifically as a platform for building applications with features similar to Firebase, utilizing a Postgres database for backend services.

• Coatue Management
• Y Combinator
• Felicis Ventures
• Coatue
• Peak XV Partners
• Craft Ventures
• Tom Preston-Werner

Supabase operates in the Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) market, where it faces competition from several notable platforms:

1. Firebase: Owned by Google, Firebase is one of the most established BaaS platforms. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools for app development, including real-time databases, authentication, and cloud functions. Firebase is known for its scalability and integration with other Google services, but it is not open-source.

2. Appwrite: An open-source backend server designed for frontend developers, Appwrite provides similar functionalities to Supabase, including user authentication and database management. Its self-hosting capabilities are a significant advantage for developers looking for control over their infrastructure.

3. Parse: Originally developed by Facebook, Parse is now an open-source platform that allows developers to build applications with a focus on mobile. It offers features like push notifications and cloud functions, but it may not be as modern or flexible as Supabase.

4. AWS Amplify: Part of Amazon Web Services, AWS Amplify provides a set of tools and services for building scalable applications. It integrates well with other AWS services, making it a strong choice for developers already using the AWS ecosystem, but it can be complex to set up.

5. Hasura: Hasura is known for its instant GraphQL APIs over Postgres databases. It excels in real-time data handling and is particularly advantageous for applications that require complex queries and subscriptions.

6. NHost: NHost is another open-source alternative that provides a full-stack serverless platform. It offers features like GraphQL APIs, authentication, and file storage, similar to Supabase, but with a focus on serverless architecture.

7. Backendless: This platform offers a range of backend services, including user management and real-time data. It is known for its visual development tools, which can simplify the app-building process.

8. PocketBase: A lightweight alternative that provides a simple backend solution with real-time capabilities. It is particularly appealing for smaller projects or developers looking for a minimalistic approach.

Notable differences include Supabase's focus on being open-source and its use of PostgreSQL, which provides powerful relational database capabilities. Additionally, Supabase offers real-time subscriptions and edge functions, which are essential for modern web applications.